AI Technical & Product Strategy ·Team Building & Leadership ·Physical AI
Jonathan Lwowski
Field CTO · Physical AI & Robotics at Nebius
I help people build AI and robotics products that earn their place in the real world. That includes the team, the product direction, and the technical work needed to make the system reliable.

Currently building Physical AI at Nebius.
A few things I'm proud of
- 13
- people on the AI team I built and led
- 20+
- research publications, alongside 4 patents
- 200k+
- daily requests on a stock analytics platform I co-founded
About
I like working with people who are trying to make AI and robotics useful in the real world. We start with the customer problem, make a clear product bet, and stay close to the details that decide whether a system holds up after it leaves the lab.
I care about building teams where people can do their best work and speak honestly when something is not working. For me, that means hiring thoughtfully, coaching hands-on, setting clear priorities, and making time to learn together.
- AI & Robotics Strategy
- Product & Roadmap Ownership
- Building & Running AI Teams
- Computer Vision & Perception
- Physical AI Workflows
- ML Platform & MLOps
- Customer Discovery
- Executive Stakeholder Engagement
A few examples
A few public examples of the team, product, and technical work I have led.
Case study 01
Building an applied AI organization
Zeitview | Director of AI/ML
Establish an AI organization and operating model that could support multiple product verticals.
Created a multidisciplinary foundation for delivering AI capabilities across five business verticals.
Case study 02
Turning inspection data into intelligence
Kespry and Zeitview | Computer Vision and ML Leadership
Move computer vision work beyond prototypes and into inspection workflows with real delivery constraints.
Built experience delivering inspection intelligence for residential and industrial use cases.
Case study 03
Scaling a real-time analytics product
GammaEdge | Co-Founder
Create and operate an analytics platform that customers could use at meaningful daily volume.
Serves more than 200,000 daily requests.
How I work
For me, building a useful ML product is less about rushing to train a model and more about making good decisions together. I like to start with the real problem, be honest about the constraints, and give the team a clear next step.
Read the AI & PM Insights guide that inspired this framework (opens in a new tab)01
Start with a problem people actually feel
I begin with the customer decision and the outcome that needs to improve. When the value, user, or measure of success is still fuzzy, it is usually time to learn more instead of building a model.
02
Be honest about the data
I look closely at what data is available, how representative it is, and what it will take to label, govern, and maintain it. Those realities should shape the plan from day one.
03
Agree on what good looks like
Before optimizing anything, I want the team to agree on what good looks like. A useful evaluation connects model behavior to a real decision, workflow, or customer outcome.
04
Keep the first version small and useful
Use the simplest model and integration that can test the product bet. It is much easier to plan for ownership, human intervention, monitoring, and iteration while the work is still small enough to change.
05
Decide what to do next together
Bring product, engineering, data, and operations into the conversation. The answer might be invest, narrow the scope, learn more, or choose a simpler solution. A clear answer helps everyone move forward.
Insights
View allThings I have learned about leading teams, making product decisions, and building AI systems that have to work in the real world.
Sep 2025 · 2 min read
Why Physical AI Teams Become Infrastructure Companies
Product strategy for robotics must account for the data, simulation, evaluation, and compute systems that make dependable physical intelligence possible.
Physical AI · Product Strategy · AI Infrastructure
Apr 2024 · 2 min read
Go/No-Go Decisions for Machine Learning Products
A practical decision framework for choosing whether an ML initiative has enough evidence, data, and delivery readiness to advance.
Machine Learning · Product Management · Strategy
Apr 2024 · 2 min read
Estimate ML Effort Before You Commit
Estimate the work, risk, and likelihood of success across the full ML product lifecycle before setting expectations.
Machine Learning · Planning · Leadership
Publications
More than 20 research publications and four patents across robotics, computer vision, and multi-agent systems.
View Google Scholar (opens in a new tab)Experience
Jun 2026 to Present
Field CTO · Physical AI & Robotics
Nebius
Co-leading Physical AI across product strategy, engineering, customer discovery, and field delivery for a robotics infrastructure platform.
Sep 2021 to Jun 2026
Director of AI/ML
Zeitview
Grew the AI department from zero to 13 people, established its operating model, and owned AI product, engineering, perception, and autonomy strategy across five business verticals.
May 2021 to Present
Co-Founder
GammaEdge LLC
Founded and grew a real-time options analytics platform serving more than 200,000 daily requests.
Aug 2025 to Present
Strategic AI Advisor
Strike Coach
Advising leadership on AI strategy and scalable growth.
Jan 2020 to Aug 2021
Lead Machine Learning Engineer
Kespry
Led machine-learning platform and computer-vision development for residential and industrial inspection.
Jul 2019 to Jan 2020
Senior Data Scientist
Booz Allen Hamilton
Conducted applied research in image steganography detection, purification, and adversarial robustness.
May 2018 to Jun 2019
Artificial Intelligence Developer
Plus One Robotics
Led computer-vision integration for robotic manipulation, including pick-point detection and place verification.
Feb 2013 to May 2019
Undergraduate & Graduate Research Assistant
The University of Texas at San Antonio
Conducted robotics and controls research in UAV and UGV obstacle avoidance, multi-robot formation control, and cloud robotic networks.
Education
2016 to 2019
PhD, Electrical Engineering
The University of Texas at San Antonio
Control Systems · GPA 3.95
2012 to 2016
BS, Computer Engineering
The University of Texas at San Antonio
GPA 3.6